mediumCVE-2026-45811

CVE-2026-45811 Apache NimBLE vulnerability

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in Apache NimBLE. The HCI socket transport did not check whether a received HCI event would fit the configured event pool before copying it, allowing a buffer overflow. Severity is low: exploitation requires either a misconfigured pool size or a malicious/compromised controller on the other end of the HCI socket link, not over-the-air Bluetooth access. This issue affects Apache NimBLE: through 1.9.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.10.0, which fixes the issue.

Browse Memory Corruption security risks
ProductApache NimBLE
Risk levelMedium
EPSSNot scored yet
UpdatedJuly 24, 2026

Quick answer

Apache Software Foundation Apache NimBLE should be reviewed and updated if it matches the affected versions. The recommended fix is to apply the vendor-supported patched version or the mitigation steps below, then retest the public website with Fixnx.

Who is affected

Affected versions

  • <= 1.9.0

Fixed versions

  • Apply the latest vendor-supported patched version.

How to fix it

CVE-2026-45811 affects Apache NimBLE and involves memory-safety failure. A crafted input may corrupt memory, crash the process, or enable code execution in the affected context. Prioritize deployments that process untrusted input, expose the affected feature, or hold sensitive data. No confirmed fixed version is recorded for CVE-2026-45811; follow the linked vendor advisory, apply its mitigation, and update Apache NimBLE as soon as a supported patched release is available.

  1. Inventory every deployment, device, package, plugin, container, build, and environment that uses Apache NimBLE.
  2. Compare the installed version with the recorded affected range: <= 1.9.0.
  3. No confirmed fixed version is recorded for CVE-2026-45811; follow the linked vendor advisory, apply its mitigation, and update Apache NimBLE as soon as a supported patched release is available.
  4. Until patched, limit untrusted files and peers, apply resource limits, and isolate the affected parser or service.
  5. Review configuration, roles, tokens, network paths, and exposed endpoints connected to Apache NimBLE; remove access that is not required.
  6. Review application, system, proxy, and audit logs for requests and behavior linked to the affected feature and CVE.
  7. If exploitation is suspected, isolate affected assets, preserve evidence, rotate exposed credentials or keys, restore trusted data, and rebuild compromised systems before returning them to service.

Scan now. Google sign-in is only needed to unlock fix guidance.

Verify the fix

  • Confirm every affected asset now runs the fixed vendor-supported release or has the documented mitigation for CVE-2026-45811 in place.
  • Use a safe regression test to confirm the affected memory-safety failure path no longer produces the vulnerable behavior.
  • Confirm temporary access controls, endpoint restrictions, network blocks, and least-privilege settings remain effective after the update.
  • Review post-remediation logs and rerun Fixnx plus the relevant package, dependency, firmware, browser, or product-specific security check.
  • Document affected assets, versions, changes, validation evidence, reviewed logs, and any credential rotation, cleanup, or replacement completed.

Related categories

Related security risks

More published guidance from the same primary category.

Trusted references

FAQ

What is affected by CVE-2026-45811?

Apache Software Foundation Apache NimBLE versions listed as affected should be reviewed: <= 1.9.0.

What should I fix first?

Start with internet-facing sites, admin panels, login flows, plugins, themes, modules, packages, and systems that process user-controlled input or sensitive data.

How do I confirm the fix worked?

Apply the patched version or mitigation, clear caches where relevant, retest the affected workflow, and run a new Fixnx scan to verify public website exposure signals.

How are Fixnx security risk categories chosen?

Fixnx keeps one canonical risk page and assigns only broad, relevant categories such as ecosystem, technology area, or vulnerability class.