Scan your website for security risks.

Most website incidents start with small public mistakes: a forgotten backup file, a weak login route, a missing browser protection, or an API endpoint that reveals more than expected. A scan gives teams a practical way to see those problems before users or attackers do.

Fixnx is designed for fast feedback. It separates confirmed issues from likely signals, explains evidence clearly, and keeps low-impact hardening items from drowning out the risks that should be fixed first.

Use this page as a launch point before a release, after a major frontend change, or whenever a new domain becomes public.

A good web security scanner should tell a story: what was tested, what was proven, what is only suspicious, and what should happen next. Without that structure, teams waste time arguing about noisy results.

Fixnx keeps the report focused on concrete risk. Confirmed vulnerabilities are separated from likely findings and informational coverage notes, so teams can fix the highest-impact issues first.

Run a scan when new pages, APIs, authentication changes, or third-party scripts are deployed.

Many API risks are not hidden in complex exploits. They come from endpoints that were meant to be internal, debug routes left exposed, or user-owned resources that do not enforce authorization consistently.

Fixnx helps by showing the discovered API surface, classifying endpoint purpose, and attaching evidence to high-risk findings. That makes it easier to talk about API security with developers and product owners.

Use API scanning after frontend releases, backend route changes, and authentication refactors.

Teams cannot protect routes they do not know about. An attack surface scan gives a practical map of the public website and the API signals that appear during rendering.

Fixnx keeps the scan bounded so it is useful during normal work. It reports how many pages, endpoints, parameters, and active probes were covered, which makes the result easier to trust.

Use this scan before a launch, before onboarding a customer, or when you inherit an existing website.

Headers help browsers enforce safer behavior, but a missing header should not be treated the same as confirmed SQL injection or authentication bypass. Priority matters.

Fixnx checks the common browser protections and explains what they do in plain language. The report keeps hardening recommendations useful while still prioritizing higher-impact vulnerabilities.

Use this page when you want a quick header review before sending a site to customers or auditors.

You do not need a full security program to start improving your website. A public security check can find missing protections, exposed files, and obvious configuration mistakes quickly.

Fixnx keeps the first report readable. It shows what passed, what failed, and what needs more proof before being treated as confirmed.

Run a free check whenever you launch a new site, change hosting, or connect a new domain.

OWASP is useful because it gives teams a shared language. But checklists become noisy when every item looks equally urgent.

Fixnx keeps the OWASP-style view practical by showing severity, confidence, evidence, and recommended first fixes. That helps teams move from awareness to action.

Use this scanner to create a security baseline before deeper manual testing.

A scanner should not call SQL injection confirmed because a page looks suspicious. It should show what changed: status, response shape, record count, timing, or error behavior.

Fixnx reports SQL injection with evidence summaries and keeps weaker signals marked as likely. That helps developers reproduce the issue without overstating proof.

Use this check especially on search, login, and API filter routes.

A payload reflected into text is not the same as browser-side JavaScript execution. Treating them the same creates false confidence and noisy reports.

Fixnx uses confidence labels so stored-but-not-executed findings stay likely, while browser execution evidence is required for confirmed XSS.

Use this scanner after adding search, rich text, reviews, comments, or user profile features.

Changing an ID and receiving 200 is a signal, not proof. The response might be public, empty, or scoped correctly.

Fixnx keeps that distinction visible. Confirmed IDOR requires evidence that one user accessed data owned by another user.

For best results, provide userA and userB sessions so the scanner can compare ownership boundaries.

A token-looking response is not enough. A strong authentication finding should show that the scanner reused the artifact against a protected endpoint.

Fixnx reports login endpoint, payload preview, response status, session artifact type, verification endpoint, and authentication model with masked secrets.

Use this page when a site has login, account areas, or admin functionality.

Users expect HTTPS everywhere. Search engines, browsers, and customers all treat broken transport security as a trust issue.

Fixnx checks whether HTTPS works, whether HTTP redirects safely, and whether page content creates insecure browser behavior.

Run this check after DNS changes, CDN changes, certificate renewals, and hosting migrations.

A useful developer security report should show where the issue is, what evidence was collected, and what change is likely to fix it.

Fixnx avoids treating every signal as confirmed. That makes the output easier to trust and easier to turn into engineering tasks.

Use Fixnx before releases, after authentication changes, and when new public endpoints are added.

Before a formal review, buyers often look at the basics: HTTPS, headers, exposed routes, login behavior, and whether public APIs appear controlled.

Fixnx gives SaaS teams a fast way to inspect those signals and produce a report that product, engineering, and security teams can understand together.

Use it before enterprise deals, major launches, and security questionnaire cycles.

The goal is not to slow the team down. The goal is to catch the public mistakes that are cheap to fix now and expensive to explain later.

Fixnx gives startups a simple path: scan, read the top risks, fix what matters, and rerun the report.

Use it before product launches, public demos, and the first enterprise conversations.

A high-severity label is not enough. Security teams need to know whether the scanner proved impact or only found a strong signal.

Fixnx makes confidence part of the report model. That keeps confirmed vulnerabilities separate from supporting evidence and coverage notes.

Use Fixnx to prioritize external review and give engineers a focused list of fixes.

A config can look correct in code and still behave differently once CDN rules, redirects, headers, and hosting layers are involved.

Fixnx checks the live website from the outside, which makes it useful after infrastructure changes and public releases.

Use it as a quick post-deploy validation step for public web properties.

Good security writing does not need to sound complex. It should help a team understand what happened, why it matters, and what to do next.

Use the Fixnx blog as a source for practical posts about web risk, scanning, remediation, and security habits that real teams can adopt.

Each article is written to be useful for founders, developers, and security reviewers.

A scan tells you what was found today. A guide helps your team avoid the same issue next month.

The Fixnx guide collection is designed to pair with scan reports so teams can move from finding to fix to prevention.

Start with the website checklist if you are preparing a launch, or the remediation guide if you already have findings.

Start with transport security: HTTPS should work, HTTP should redirect safely, and forms should not submit over insecure connections.

Then review browser protections, public files, login routes, API endpoints, and user input. The goal is not perfection in one pass; it is repeatable improvement.

Use Fixnx to automate the first pass and keep the checklist connected to evidence.

Start by listing the API routes that are reachable from the browser. If you cannot describe what each route does, it is hard to defend it.

Next, test whether routes require the right authentication, enforce object-level authorization, avoid exposing sensitive fields, and handle errors safely.

Fixnx helps by discovering and classifying API endpoints, then attaching evidence to security findings.

The OWASP Top 10 is not a magic checklist, but it is a helpful map of the risks that appear repeatedly in web applications.

Use it to organize findings, not to replace evidence. A confirmed authentication bypass should outrank a low-impact header warning even if both appear in a security report.

Fixnx aligns scan output with this practical approach: proof first, priority second, explanation always.

Start with confirmed exploitable vulnerabilities, especially public unauthenticated issues and anything that grants authenticated access or exposes data.

Next, review likely high-impact issues. They may need more proof, but they often point to risky code paths or authorization boundaries.

After fixes are deployed, rerun the scan and compare evidence. Remediation is complete only when the risky behavior no longer appears.

A manual pentest can find complex business logic issues that scanners may miss. But it is usually slower, more expensive, and less frequent.

Fixnx helps teams clean up public issues before a pentest and rerun checks after fixes. That makes manual testing time more valuable.

Use Fixnx continuously and bring in manual testers for high-risk releases, compliance, and deep application review.

A scanner can be technically correct and still hard to use. If every finding looks urgent, teams stop trusting the report.

Fixnx separates confirmed vulnerabilities from likely issues and supporting evidence. That makes the report more useful for engineering and business conversations.

Use this comparison when evaluating tools for public website and API scanning.

OWASP ZAP gives skilled users a broad testing toolkit. It is especially useful when someone wants to manually drive testing and tune behavior.

Fixnx focuses on a simpler workflow: enter a target, run bounded checks, and get a report with recommended fixes and confidence labels.

Teams may use both: ZAP for hands-on testing, Fixnx for fast recurring visibility.

Burp Suite is excellent when a skilled tester wants detailed control. It can support deep testing that goes beyond automated website scans.

Fixnx is built for speed and clarity. It gives teams a fast way to understand public web risk and export a report that non-specialists can read.

For many teams, Fixnx helps clean up public issues before a deeper Burp-driven review.

Security tools often create more confusion than clarity. Fixnx is built around a simple idea: show what was tested, what was proven, and what should be fixed first.

The product combines security, SEO, and performance checks because website teams often need one clear picture before a launch or customer review.

Fixnx is designed for practical work: scan, understand, fix, and retest.

When contacting a security product team, include the target domain, scan ID if available, what you expected, and what looked wrong or unclear.

For sensitive reports, avoid sending raw tokens, passwords, or private customer data. Fixnx masks secrets in reports, and support conversations should follow the same habit.

If your request is about a vulnerability in Fixnx itself, use the responsible disclosure page.

Security scanning should not become a source of new risk. Fixnx avoids destructive checks, keeps payloads bounded, and masks sensitive artifacts in reports.

The product also avoids false certainty. Findings are labeled by confidence so users know whether exploitability was confirmed or only suggested.

For authenticated scans, provide only scoped test accounts and rotate credentials when testing is complete.

A useful report explains the affected area, the steps to reproduce, the impact, and the environment. Screenshots or short evidence summaries help, but raw secrets should not be included.

Do not access, modify, delete, or share data that does not belong to you. Avoid denial-of-service testing, social engineering, spam, and persistence.

Fixnx values clear, safe reports that help protect users and improve the product.

A scanner may process target URLs, response metadata, findings, scan events, and report evidence. Teams should avoid submitting secrets as target input and should use scoped accounts for authenticated tests.

Fixnx report output is designed to mask sensitive artifacts such as tokens and avoid printing raw secrets.

This page is an informational product overview and should be reviewed alongside any formal legal policy your organization requires.

Only scan systems you own or have explicit permission to test. Do not use Fixnx for harassment, denial of service, brute force, spam, or unauthorized access.

Authenticated scans should use scoped test accounts whenever possible. Keep credentials secure and rotate them after testing when appropriate.

This page is a product terms overview and does not replace formal legal review.

A scan may move through queued, running, partial, completed, or failed states. The most important signal is whether each category has completed or reported an error.

If a scan appears slow, the report should show which category is running and expose console logs with phase information for troubleshooting.

This page is a product overview. A live public status integration can be added when operational monitoring is connected.