CVE-2026-49099 camel vulnerability
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Salesforce Component. The camel-salesforce producer resolves its operation parameters - the SOQL query, the SOSL search, the target SObject name and id, the Apex REST URL and method, and the Apex query parameters - from Exchange message headers, reading the header in preference to the value configured on the endpoint (AbstractSalesforceProcessor.getParameter() reads the header first and uses the endpoint configuration only as a fallback). The control-header constants in SalesforceEndpointConfig (for example SOBJECT_QUERY = sObjectQuery, SOBJECT_SEARCH = sObjectSearch, SOBJECT_NAME = sObjectName, SOBJECT_ID = sObjectId, APEX_URL = apexUrl, APEX_METHOD = apexMethod, and the apexQueryParam. prefix) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a salesforce: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set these headers and override what the route intended - supplying its own SOQL query or SOSL search to read data from any SObject the connected Salesforce user can access, overriding the target SObject name and id for CRUD operations, or redirecting an Apex REST call to a different endpoint and HTTP method (including destructive methods) with injected query parameters. All such operations run with the full permissions of the Salesforce connected (integration) user, which is typically broad. No credentials are required from the attacker when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Salesforce operation parameters via the raw header names must use the CamelSalesforce* names (for example CamelSalesforceSObjectQuery and CamelSalesforceApexUrl) instead of the old sObject* / apex* values; the endpoint-option spelling is unchanged. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Salesforce control headers from any untrusted ingress before the salesforce: producer (for example removeHeaders('sObject*') and removeHeaders('apex*') at the start of the route), and set the query, SObject and Apex parameters from a trusted source.
Quick answer
apache camel should be reviewed and updated if it matches the affected versions. The recommended fix is to apply the vendor-supported patched version or the mitigation steps below, then retest the public website with Fixnx.
Who is affected
Affected versions
- Review vendor advisory for affected versions.
Fixed versions
- Apply the latest vendor-supported patched version.
How to fix it
CVE-2026-49099 affects Apache Camel Salesforce. Upgrade Apache Camel on the deployed branch to a fixed release (4.14.8, 4.18.3, 4.21.0) and review routes that expose this component to external or user-controlled messages. Affected ranges in the local NVD record are 4.0.0 through before 4.14.8; 4.15.0 through before 4.18.3; 4.19.0 through before 4.21.0.
- Inventory every service, integration route, container image, and build manifest that includes Apache Camel Salesforce or transitive Camel modules related to Salesforce.
- Compare each deployed Camel version with the affected ranges for CVE-2026-49099; treat 4.0.x-4.14.7, 4.15.x-4.18.2, and 4.19.x-4.20.x as needing an upgrade when the component is present.
- Upgrade to the fixed Camel release for the active branch: 4.14.8, 4.18.3, 4.21.0, or a later vendor-supported release.
- Rebuild application artifacts and container images from a clean dependency lockfile so no vulnerable Camel module remains through transitive dependencies.
- Harden exposed routes by filtering user-controlled Camel headers and component-specific control headers before data reaches Camel producers or internal route logic.
- Rotate credentials or integration tokens if logs, routing headers, backend endpoints, or message contents may have been exposed or redirected through the vulnerable route.
- Deploy first to staging, run regression tests for the impacted route, then promote to production with monitoring for routing errors, authorization failures, SSRF attempts, and unexpected message destinations.
Scan now. Google sign-in is only needed to unlock fix guidance.
Verify the fix
- Confirm dependency output shows Apache Camel 4.14.8, 4.18.3, 4.21.0 or a later fixed release in every affected application.
- Run route-level tests that replay malicious or unexpected headers and verify they are removed, ignored, or rejected before reaching Camel internals.
- Check application logs after deployment for exceptions, leaked stack traces, SSRF indicators, unauthorized backend operations, or unexpected route destinations.
- Open the generated Fixnx page and confirm the canonical URL ends with camel-cve-2026-49099.
- Re-run sitemap validation and confirm camel-cve-2026-49099 appears once in sitemap.xml with the full CVE-2026-49099 suffix.
Related categories
Trusted references
FAQ
What is affected by CVE-2026-49099?
apache camel should be checked against the vendor advisory and trusted references linked on this page.
What should I fix first?
Start with internet-facing sites, admin panels, login flows, plugins, themes, modules, packages, and systems that process user-controlled input or sensitive data.
How do I confirm the fix worked?
Apply the patched version or mitigation, clear caches where relevant, retest the affected workflow, and run a new Fixnx scan to verify public website exposure signals.
How are Fixnx security risk categories chosen?
Fixnx keeps one canonical risk page and assigns only broad, relevant categories such as ecosystem, technology area, or vulnerability class.
