CVE-2026-54291 postgresql jdbc driver vulnerability
pgjdbc is an open source postgresql JDBC Driver. In releases 42.7.4 through 42.7.11, channelBinding=require connections can be silently downgraded from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS with channel binding to plain SCRAM-SHA-256 without it, losing the man-in-the-middle protection the setting is meant to guarantee. An attacker who can intercept the TLS connection can trigger the downgrade with a certificate whose signature algorithm has no tls-server-end-point channel-binding hash, because the bundled com.ongres.scram:scram-client returns an empty byte array instead of failing and pgJDBC ScramAuthenticator checks only that the server advertised a PLUS mechanism, without rejecting the empty binding or checking that the negotiated mechanism uses channel binding. This issue is fixed in version 42.7.12.
Quick answer
postgresql jdbc driver should be reviewed and updated if it matches the affected versions. The recommended fix is to apply the vendor-supported patched version or the mitigation steps below, then retest the public website with Fixnx.
Who is affected
Affected versions
- Review vendor advisory for affected versions.
Fixed versions
- Apply the latest vendor-supported patched version.
How to fix it
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver is affected by CVE-2026-54291, a TLS channel-binding downgrade risk. pgjdbc is an open source postgresql JDBC Driver. The recommended remediation is to update to PostgreSQL JDBC Driver 42.7.12 or later. Until the update is complete, require channel binding only with a fixed pgjdbc driver and validate TLS certificate/channel-binding behavior, review logs, and reduce exposure of the affected service, library, appliance, or trusted firmware path.
- Inventory every deployment, package, appliance, service, application dependency, trusted firmware image, and managed environment that uses PostgreSQL JDBC Driver.
- Confirm the installed version/build and compare it with releases 42.7.4 through 42.7.11 and the source advisory for CVE-2026-54291.
- Apply the vendor-supported fix: update to PostgreSQL JDBC Driver 42.7.12 or later.
- If the update cannot be applied immediately, require channel binding only with a fixed pgjdbc driver and validate TLS certificate/channel-binding behavior; disable unnecessary public access, file processing, authentication integrations, upload endpoints, or high-risk features until patched.
- Review application, appliance, reverse-proxy, WAF, package manager, authentication, trusted firmware, and audit logs for activity related to CVE-2026-54291.
- Rotate sessions, API tokens, service credentials, integration keys, signing keys, and administrator passwords if logs or affected data indicate compromise, code execution, credential exposure, or unauthorized access.
- Clear caches, restart affected services, rebuild affected containers or firmware images when appropriate, and remove temporary files, uploaded artifacts, stored payloads, or unsafe configuration created during exploitation attempts.
Scan now. Google sign-in is only needed to unlock fix guidance.
Verify the fix
- Confirm PostgreSQL JDBC Driver now reports PostgreSQL JDBC Driver 42.7.12 or later or a later vendor-supported fixed release/build for the deployed branch.
- Verify the affected workflow no longer allows the behavior described in CVE-2026-54291, using a safe regression test, vendor validation method, dependency inventory, or appliance health check.
- Review logs after remediation for continued exploit attempts, authentication anomalies, denial-of-service symptoms, suspicious uploads, file access, deserialization attempts, or configuration changes.
- Rerun a Fixnx scan and any product-specific scanner, package audit, firmware inventory, appliance health check, or manual regression test relevant to the affected service.
- Document affected assets, fixed versions, mitigation decisions, validation evidence, and any cleanup, rebuild, or credential rotation performed.
Related categories
Trusted references
FAQ
What is affected by CVE-2026-54291?
postgresql jdbc driver should be checked against the vendor advisory and trusted references linked on this page.
What should I fix first?
Start with internet-facing sites, admin panels, login flows, plugins, themes, modules, packages, and systems that process user-controlled input or sensitive data.
How do I confirm the fix worked?
Apply the patched version or mitigation, clear caches where relevant, retest the affected workflow, and run a new Fixnx scan to verify public website exposure signals.
How are Fixnx security risk categories chosen?
Fixnx keeps one canonical risk page and assigns only broad, relevant categories such as ecosystem, technology area, or vulnerability class.